 |
Source:
www.moh.gov.sg |
Statement on medical subsidies for
foreign workers |
|
Currently, public hospitals and polyclinics
treat foreigners and citizens alike, as far as access to government
subsidy is concerned. |
The Ministry of Health is reviewing this
policy. As subsidy is inevitably limited, more subsidy for foreigners
means less subsidy for the needy citizens. |
There is a case for removing healthcare
subsidy from foreigners. In particular, subsidising foreign workers
means subsidising employers, which is probably not appropriate. |
Actually, the vast majority of employers
provide medical benefits as part of employment terms. Most employers of
foreign workers send their workers for treatment at private GPs. But a
minority of employers do not. They should be encouraged to follow
industry norm. |
NTUC has supported the proposed approach for
foreign workers. In a press statement, NTUC highlighted that the
employers should pay for the healthcare costs of their foreign workers
as part of their employment terms, with or without Government subsidy. |
MOH is studying the details, with a view to
implement the revised approach in polyclinics before end 2005. |
Foreigners who use polyclinics services will
then be charged at full cost. |
As for public hospitals, MOH is working with
MOM and NTUC to see if we should make it mandatory for medical insurance
to be introduced for foreign workers. |
Related Info: |
NTUC Press Statement supporting the Ministry's proposal - "Employers
Should be Responsible for Overall Health & Welfare of All Workers" |
Source:
www.moh.gov.sg Press Release 29 Sep
2005 |
 |
Important
Notice |
Our FrontPage
Editions are a historical record of our Web site and reflect
the changing of the times, and also of our Web site through
time. We do not and will not update the links and stories on
these FrontPages even if they have become obsolete. |
|