|
 |
Source:
www.gov.sg |
Second Reading Speech on Small Claims Tribunals
(Amendment) Bill 2005 by Deputy Prime Minister, Co-ordinating Minister
for National Security and Minister for Law Prof S Jayakumar, Mon, 21
November 2005 |
|
Mr Speaker, Sir, I beg to move, that the
Bill be now read a second time. |
Sir, this Bill amends the Small Claims
Tribunals Act to expand the jurisdiction of the Small Claims Tribunal (SCT)
and to require leave of court before an appeal can be made against an
SCT order. |
Sir, let me explain, the SCT was established
almost 20 years ago to provide a quick and inexpensive forum to resolve
small claims between consumers and suppliers. |
We have been gradually expanding the
jurisdiction of the SCT over the years. At present, the SCT deals with
claims arising from contracts for the sale of goods or provision of
services and claims for damage to property, excluding damage arising in
connection with motor vehicle accidents. The claim limit is $10,000, but
it can be raised to $20,000 with the consent of both parties. |
This Bill seeks to expand the jurisdiction
of the Tribunal, to allow it to determine claims arising from short-term
residential tenancy agreements not exceeding 2 years which are normally
straightforward and not complicated. |
This amendment will benefit both landlords
and tenants as it provides them with a speedy and cost effective means
of resolving some of their disputes. |
Landlords seeking to recover unpaid rent
within the small claims limit, as well as tenants who have either rented
an entire property or a single room in disputes over rent deposits will
now have a cheaper, quicker avenue to press these claims. |
The expanded jurisdiction only applies to
residential properties. The Tribunal will not have the jurisdiction to
hear disputes arising from leases of commercial properties, as such
leases are likely to be quite technical and far more complicated. |
Sir, with the expanded jurisdiction, the SCT
will be empowered to deal with a wider range of disputes that consumers
are likely to be involved in. |
Sir, this Bill also amends the Small Claims
Tribunals Act to require leave of court to proceed with an appeal
against an order made by the SCT. |
Sir, let me explain. At present, appeals
against an SCT order can be made as of right to the High Court, but only
on a question of law or on the ground that the claim was outside the
jurisdiction of the Tribunal. The scope for an appeal is deliberately
narrow, in order to promote finality, and to avoid high costs in
appealing that may exceed the sums in dispute. |
Sir, the Bill amends the Act to require the
leave of the District Court before an appeal can be made against an SCT
order. With this amendment, the position of appeals against SCT orders
will be brought into alignment with appeals against decisions of a
District Court or a Magistrate's Court[1]. |
The grounds for appeal will not be affected
or further limited by this amendment, whose main effect is to ensure
that the parties will not be put to unnecessary expense, for example, in
cases where there is no prospect of an appeal succeeding. |
Sir, I beg to move. |
[1]
Appeals from District and Magistrates' Courts 21. - (1) Subject to the
provisions of this Act or any other written law, an appeal shall lie to
the High Court from a decision of a District Court or Magistrate's Court
in any suit or action for the recovery of immovable property or in any
civil cause or matter where the amount in dispute or the value of the
subject-matter exceeds $50,000 or such other amount as may be specified
by an order made under subsection (3) or with the leave of a District
Court, a Magistrate's Court or the High Court if under that amount. |
Source:
www.minlaw.gov.sg News Release 21
Nov 2005 |
 |
Important
Notice |
Our FrontPage
Editions are a historical record of our Web site and reflect
the changing of the times, and also of our Web site through
time. We do not and will not update the links and stories on
these FrontPages even if they have become obsolete. |
|