|
 |
Source:
www.gov.sg |
The Payment Systems (Oversight) Bill |
Second Reading Speech by Mr Tharman
Shanmugaratnam, Minister For Education and Deputy Chairman, Monetary
Authority of Singapore |
|
|
Mr Speaker Sir, on behalf of the Senior
Minister, I beg to move. "That the Bill be now read a second time." |
Sir, the purpose of this Bill is to introduce a new
framework for the oversight of payment systems. |
The framework also covers the regulation of
stored value facilities (SVF), which refer to prepaid cards and other
payment instruments used for the purchase of goods and services. |
MAS has consulted the industry and the
public on this framework and the feedback received has indicated broad
support for it. MAS has incorporated the feedback received into the
Bill, where practicable and where they are in line with its objectives. |
NEED FOR A CONSISTENT FRAMEWORK FOR
THE OVERSIGHT OF PAYMENT SYSTEMS AND STORED VALUE FACILITIES IN
SINGAPORE |
Let me now set out the rationale for a
new regulatory framework for the oversight of payment systems and
SVF in Singapore. I will start with payment systems. |
Payment Systems |
In Singapore, we have a well-developed
payment system industry, consisting of a wide-ranging spectrum of
payment systems to cater to a variety of purposes. |
These payment systems can be broadly
categorised into three tiers. |
The top tier comprises Singapore's
large-value payment system, the MAS Electronic Payment System (MEPS). |
Currently, MEPS is owned and operated by
MAS, and functions as the main payment system for settling
large-value financial transactions between financial institutions.
MEPS is also linked to an international grid of large-value payment
systems via the Continuous Linked Settlement (CLS) system, which is
a global foreign exchange (FX) settlement system. The values settled
in MEPS in 2004 exceeded 70 times Singapore's GDP so it is easy to
see how a disruption in MEPS can have a systemic impact on the
financial system and the economy. |
The middle-tier comprises Singapore's
cheque-clearing systems and the Interbank GIRO system. |
While these systems process payments
that are lower in value compared to MEPS, the values involved are
not insignificant, and the payments comprise important business and
retail transactions such as salary and bill payments. As they are
closely tied to a wide range of economic functions, the safety and
efficiency of these systems are important for maintaining a high
level of public confidence in Singapore's financial system. |
The third tier is made up of retail
payment systems that handle the majority of payment transactions in
Singapore in terms of transaction volume. |
These include systems such as debit and
credit card systems, ATM networks, as well as mobile and internet
payment systems. As such systems generally process low-value retail
transactions, they have lesser impact on financial stability.
Efficiency and innovation for retail payment systems are essential
if we are to keep our economy vibrant and meet consumer needs |
Taken as a whole, the payments
infrastructure forms a critical part of our financial system and
economy. It is therefore important that we ensure that payment
systems operate in a safe and efficient manner, while encouraging
market competition and technological innovation to serve businesses
and consumers better. |
MAS and the industry have been involved
in several projects to enhance the safety and efficiency of payment
systems in Singapore. |
In 2002, MAS implemented legislation to
provide for the finality of transactions within large and
systemically important systems such as MEPS and CLS. |
The industry also implemented several
initiatives aimed at improving the efficiency of the Interbank GIRO
and cheque-clearing systems, such as the eGIRO system in 2001 and
the Cheque Truncation System in 2003, both of which eliminated
inefficient manual processes. |
A new regulatory framework for payment
systems is needed for two reasons. First, MAS' current oversight
framework for payment systems relies on legislation introduced on a
piecemeal basis and an informal and cooperative arrangement with the
industry. |
From the industry's point of view, a
more formalised and comprehensive approach would provide greater
consistency and clarity in MAS oversight objectives and policies.
Second, the existing framework worked well when financial
institutions were the traditional payment service providers, but has
become less effective now that payment service providers which are
not financial institutions are becoming increasingly common. |
Sir, the Bill will establish a new
regulatory framework for payment systems that will provide MAS with
a comprehensive and consistent basis to effectively oversee the
payments infrastructure in Singapore, while promoting a competitive
marketplace among payment service providers. |
A number of jurisdictions, such as
Australia and Canada have introduced comprehensive legislation for
the oversight of payment systems a few years ago. Hong Kong did so
about a year ago. |
Stored Value Facilities |
Sir, I will now speak on SVF. These are
prepaid payment instruments, most commonly used for low-value retail
payments. |
In Singapore, there are two nation-wide
SVF, namely the NETS Cashcard and the ez-link card, and several
smaller-scale SVF such as gift cards and store vouchers. |
SVF can be categorized as either
single-purpose or multi-purpose. |
Presently, only banks are allowed to
issue multi-purpose SVF, that is, instruments which can be used to
purchase goods and services provided by third-party merchants other
than the issuer. |
However, multi-purpose SVF when operated
on a small scale present low risk in terms of potential loss of
stored value to their users. The existing regulatory regime is
therefore unnecessarily restrictive. We should give the market more
flexibility to meet consumers' needs, and encourage competition and
innovation among different providers. |
The Bill introduces a new regulatory
regime that liberalises the multi-purpose SVF market. |
Any entity will be allowed to issue
multi-purpose SVF to consumers and to hold the stored value, as long
as the amount of stored value does not exceed a stated threshold. |
Where the stored value is above the
threshold, the holder of the stored value must be approved by MAS
and a bank licensed by MAS must also be approved to be fully liable
for the stored value. In this respect, users of these larger SVF
schemes, which the Bill terms widely accepted SVF, will benefit from
some protection on their stored value. |
MAS does not intend to subject
single-purpose SVF to the stated threshold. They will not need MAS'
approval to issue the SVF and to hold the stored value. This is also
the current position under the law. |
More..... |
Source:
www.mas.gov.sg News 16 Jan 2006 |
Related Article: |
-
MAS sets up payment systems for liberalised stored-value card market |
 |
Important
Notice |
Our FrontPage
Editions are a historical record of our Web site and reflect
the changing of the times, and also of our Web site through
time. We do not and will not update the links and stories on
these FrontPages even if they have become obsolete. |
|